The most common Mistakes in SEO Tournaments

I have. I've gone through all the stages: aspirant, Selected, finalist, winner and maybe even member of this jury on many occasions. And, believe me, seeing SEO contests from the other side removes many prejudices and anxieties.

If you are among people that believe they never win Because SEO competitions are given beforehand, you're mistaken. Look at me, I really don't have a plug everywhere and I've managed to win sometime. In addition, I will guarantee you , in the juries I have engaged in, the process has been transparent, driven only by criteria of SEO quality.

However, you don't have to be naive either. Behind some of the Best-endowed prizes there are interests that have little to do with literature (at least, that's what several writers I've talked to have told me). Regrettably, all these are also tough to win. Why? Since they're introduced with professional authors. There best SEO contest uwelcome2019 are hundreds of anonymous professional authors who are light years away from being multimillionaires, but who live off their art precisely because they triumph several SEO prizes a year.

yourself. If you are a newcomer, how about starting with the regional SEO competitions? Even prizes which are in their first editions and the participation is not yet massive. Search engine optimization prizes from small cities aren't usually badly paid and are much cheaper. Or maybe you want to try out those where the decoration is to be printed, so individuals will finally read to you. There are SEO contests of all kinds, as Víctorio Pajuo explains in this article, and according to your objectives, you have to introduce yourself to some or others. It's going be SEO contests... there is a lot of them every month!

Gratitude, ask yourself whether the story you present has a real chance of winning, because I, who have been on the other hand doing the sifting, have observed errors that you would not think. And I will let you know about them so that you do not fall for them. There they go.

ERRORS OF BULGE

1. Foundations

Seriously, if you enter a SEO competition, bother to see Carefully the rules, which can be for some thing. Just by complying with them to the letter, you've got a better prospect of winning than you think. It is incredible how many people pass them by. No extension, no typeface, maybe not the subject! They send anything they need and, ale, let us see if we're lucky! And no, of course there is not. If a participant doesn't bother to read the principles, the jury doesn't bother to read his text, that simple. That his story was good? Too bad, he delivered her to the wrong contest.

2. Not understanding the rules of Spelling and grammar

It Appears clear, but it is not: to acquire a SEO competition you Have to know how to compose. Come on, the fundamentals: putting letters together in line with the rules of spelling and combining words with meaning. Many, many, current stories filled with faults. Tildes? Comas? Pa' what? And because the jury isn't there to decipher hieroglyphics, they're removed without contemplation.

When You're a jury and you have over fifty stories

Between the unfulfilled bases and the flaws, a large part Of those participants are left from the competition. People who pass the first sieve belong to some minority. But that's when things get complicated...

STYLISTIC ERRORS

3. Not focusing of style

A Fantastic writer is one who describes the complicated with simple words. Whereas a terrible author, or inexperienced writer, is a person who tries to show off using a verbiage filled with grandiloquent words. They reload the paragraphs in such a manner it is all but impossible to understand what the story is about. I am sorry to say that in the event that you make that mistake along with the jury needs to get a dictionary to follow you, they won't think you are too smart, they will think you're overly pedantic and boring.

However, you do not need to go to another extreme : Simple doesn't mean simple. Should you repeat the very same words all of the time and hotel to weak verbs and inexpressive adjectives, you may also tire the jury. A story that doesn't have these stylistic mistakes makes the difference. Therefore, among the most important measures before submitting your story to a search engine optimization contest is to spend a good deal of time correcting your style, so that the words that remain are just and essential. You don't know how much the jury will thank you for it.

STRUCTURAL ERRORS

4. The beginning is boring

There Is a Good deal of SEO Contest uWelcome2019 emphasis on the fact that the Opening sentence must be particularly excellent. I really don't think that it's vital for a narrative to be outstanding, but it shouldn't be anodyne either. And this mistake is especially bleeding in a short story or even a micro story, in which every word counts. Too many.

Devoting several sentences to character descriptions or Setting in a short story is generally a mistake. You likely hate it if your neighbor informs you about the weather at the elevator, particularly when he warns you that it's raining when you wind up in suspenders and together with your umbrella beneath your arm. Well, the same thing happens in your narrative: does it really matter that it was cloudy or the sun was shining? That type of advice, in life and in literature, just interests us as it serves us well.

That information extends to books. For frills, it's advised that everything narrated should play a part in the story. The external physiological descriptions, the critique of all the protagonists' clothes, the section of the time in every chapter... sleep the reader and, do not doubt it, the jury of this search engine optimization contest.

5. A bad development

Then you will find the participants that have very internalized The first shocking term, however, they're not able to keep up the level during the rest of the text. You can observe they had a good narrative, but they didn't know how to tell it. Too bad.

As Vicente Marco said in the interview I did, "sometimes the best idea is how to tell the story. The most original argument from the world is useless if you don't elaborate the plot well. My recommendation is that you don't try to become a breaker if you haven't mastered the fundamental tools yet. A normal well-told story will be interesting to the jury than a very first one that is poorly developed. The jury is not going to evaluate your good intentions, but the last outcome.

There are also people who believe that a short story is to Summarize a more story or tell an anecdote, so their text lacks narrative tension. Or the participants who recreate themselves in reflections without any story as a common thread. In these scenarios, the problem is that they haven't understood that short stories and micro stories have to have their own thing: they are not the brothers of a publication nor a few beautiful and deep phrases. They must tell a whole story in a couple of words, and that's where the complication is different.

6. Failed end

The bad thing about a good beginning and a Fantastic development is That when the end isn't up to the task, it disappoints. Only those who create the 3 parts appealing can win the prize.

What errors do novice writers frequently make in the end of Their stories?

Explain the narrative: Yes, more than one does. That denotes Insecurity on the part of the author, that wants to make it crystal clear that his story had a thickness that, perhaps, the jury hasn't managed to see. Now, the jury could respond in two ways: if they had understood that the complexity of the narrative, they will ask them to describe it to them, and the player will lose many points, or even all of them; and if they hadn't seen it for themselves (and, nevertheless, it is likely they would have enjoyed the story)they will realise that the author didn't know how to transmit the ideas he had been trying to convey... and they will also subtract points from it.

Conclusion: never explain the conclusion, make an effort to be clear throughout the text. Or leave doors open for each reader to believe what they want, which is considerably more suggestive.

Recurring into the joke: You already have to perform it very well To ensure it is funny. The double meanings are extremely popular. What did it look like you're talking about your girlfriend, but you were referring to your vehicle? Well, that is not surprising , in actuality, it is possible to see it coming from afar. A story that is reduced to the last joke is readily forgotten, it will never stay in the mind of the prosecution, following dozens and dozens of stories read.

Sentimentalism: Sometimes it works, however, from my point of View, a short story does not give time to produce the essential atmosphere to Move with a last twist which touches the fiber. It is dangerous, if not Counterproductive, to overdo meaninglessness or drama. If you opt for this type Of story, everything has to be very quantified so as to not cause the reverse Result: rather than stirring, repelling.